My blog has moved! Redirecting…

You should be automatically redirected. If not, visit -- http://blog.saurabhj.com and update your bookmarks.

Sunday, December 24, 2006

Umm ... How bout a few billions?

This post comes as a result of some musing after watching the movie - Notting Hill recently.
Apart from being an extremely well made, highly entertaining romantic comedy which I thoroughly enjoyed - an incident from the movie struck me ...

If you have seen the film, it's at the dinner (William's (Hugh Grant's) sister's birthday party) at which Bernie (Hugh Bonneville) asks Anna (Julia Roberts) how much she made in the last film she worked - and she says "15 million dollars".

Hmm ...
So I pondered ...
How did it all start? I mean - how did movie stars start getting paid so much.

If you think about it, every job comes with an upper and lower limits of payment - which are pretty much well defined for a period of time.

Like, for example, it is an accepted fact that most of the bigger movie stars make millions of dollars for a film. If you think about this a bit more - you can say that this is justified as the distributors of the film eventually rake in enough money which justifies them being able to pay their actors.
This finally brings us to how much we end up paying for a movie ticket.
Here in Pune - a night show in a decent enough hall costs anywhere from 150 bucks - 200 bucks ($3 - $4) a ticket which even though is kinda on the higher side by Indian standards - I don't think people seem to mind paying it nowadays (by the number of shows running housefull even on weekdays).
And finally again, people don't seem to mind because the standards of living have gone up.
So indirectly, the more money we tend to make, the more money those actors tend to make :).
I know this is a dumb metaphor - but there is a definitely connection there (I can sense it :)).

In the end if you think about it, (even though I haven't got the faintest idea about acting) - does it warrant a sum of 15 million dollars to be paid for a film?

I will consider the next case - that of a software developer which I can more relate to.
Again, in India - it is a well known fact that software developers (or Computer Science / Engineering graduates) tend to make more money than most of the other faculties when they start off.
Even further down the line (couple of years), a software developer is likely to make more money than a similarly skilled mechanical engineer working in an automobile company.

And if you think about it - all software developers do is sit in front of a monitor all day long and type code. You don't actually need to be a genius to do it - just about any human being with a normal level of IQ and will power can do it.
Furthermore, in most of the projects - major parts of the code which you need, can be found somewhere on the internet by careful searching - which makes it more of a jigsaw puzzle assembling job than actual, smart work.

So what do software developers do - which results in them getting higher salaries, air conditioned offices and the like?

Where did all this trend start?
And how do we go about accelerating it ... ? :)

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well cant say its directly related but a friend working in a software company mentioned to me that atleast in his company they bill the clients on an hourly basis and per developer.. and this amount is almost 10 times what they are paid as salary...

Anonymous said...

so maybe they can pay so much because they get the commensurate returns..

Mulling Over My Thoughts said...

well i suppose sooner or later software developers realise what a dumb job they are doing and so quit a long time before some other folks in some other streams. i suppose it must be to compensate for that.
then again, what do i know???

nice to see you blogging agin though...

Id it is said...

As you rightly stated it's all a matter of what's in demand and to what degree.
As for Julia Roberts, I can't grudge her a thing with that winsome smile of hers.
I enjoyed Notting Hill a great deal myself.